IABC - International Association of Business CommunicatorsBe Heard HomeJoin IABCSite MapContact Us
 


publications

CW Bulletin

CW Bulletin is the e-newsletter supplement to CW magazine. Sent each month to all members, every issue of CW Bulletin presents articles, case studies and additional resources on timely topics in communication.

top.gif CW Bulletin

Using employee surveys to drive business decisions
A look at the next generation of measurement

By Rod Fralicx


In boom times, companies can be pressured into spending lavishly to please their employees, providing a variety of perks in the belief that happy employees are productive employees. While this may be true, when leaner times come and businesses struggle to grow, the goal of employee satisfaction is put under greater scrutiny. Today, investments in employee-related plans and programmes must do more than satisfy employees. They must be able to provide a measurable return on investment.

One traditional tool, employee research, has transformed in recent times. Once perceived as a "warm and fuzzy" organisational classic limited to capturing employee perceptions and opinions, employee research now incorporates other measures of the employee experience that, when properly interpreted and applied, can directly improve business outcomes.

Employee research has evolved through three stages:

Stage 1 -- Gauging satisfaction

Focus - Employee perceptions on a range of "satisfaction" issues -- including pay, benefits, supervision and workplace conditions.

Derived value - A "nice-to-know" barometer of employee satisfation/dissatisfaction with company and HR policies and programs.

Stage 2 -- Assessing for content

Focus -- Employee perceptions of a broader range of issues relating to the company's unique operating context -- including its external environment, business design and specific workforce practices.

Derived value -- A more strategic diagnostic tool measuring the relationship between employee perceptions and business outcomes (such as absenteeism, employee safety and customer retention) and providing insight on where to focus improvement efforts or change activities.

Stage 3 -- Measuring for impact

Focus -- Employee perceptions integrated with other aspects of the employee experience within the company's unique operating context.

Derived value -- The most thorough assessment available to quantify and connect the whole employee experience to workforce behaviours and business outcomes.

There is no doubt that connecting what employees say and understand to perceived workforce and business outcomes is a powerful management tool. Yet the most compelling advancement in the transformation of employee research, measuring for impact, has only just begun to take hold. It is a process that enables organisations to combine employee perceptions with other aspects of the employee experience and to uncover how these affect business performance.

To build this research capability, new methods have now been pioneered for measuring the impact of employee attributes, practices and attitudes on business performance. Set in context, these methods allow organisations to build a picture of how their workforce takes shape over time and to determine the consequences of changes on business performance.

Creating a more complete picture of the employee experience assumes that perceptions represent only a portion of that experience. Understanding the other components requires additional internal and external data, including an organisation's HR and payroll systems as well as data on the local market. Combining this information allows organisations to get a picture of their unique internal labour market. This picture highlights movements into, through and out of a company as well as the underlying drivers of these movements. The analysis also provides insights into the skills and attributes most valued by the organisation.

Internal labour market analysis can be used before, in conjunction with or after a survey, depending on the specific needs of the organisation. For example, if the analysis is conducted first, it can form the basis of the questions that the survey must address to fully understand the reasons behind specific cause and effect relationships -- and the potential resolution of major issues.

The difference between this new methodology and past approaches is that it uses an organisation's historical experience (both employer and employees') to model the future -- identifying cause and effect relationships between workforce perceptions, practices and business outcomes.

On their own, employee surveys can help organisations understand what employees say and feel about the firm and how their perceptions affect business performance. But combining this information with an understanding and a measure of the more comprehensive employee experience can have a far more dramatic impact on business performance.

As traditional and non-traditional measurement capabilities become more sophisticated and are applied to intangible assets, demand from top management for proof of economic returns on a firm's HR policies, programmes and initiatives can only increase.

Case Study

A major financial services firm was experiencing a turnover problem with regards to employees who quit within their first year of employment. Through an internal labour market analysis it was discovered that, though turnover was highly sensitive to changes in unemployment rates, there were many actions that could be taken to address the problem.

The company decided to focus on improving the way it incorporated and socialised employees into the firm. It launched an orientation programme to educate new staff about the firm's values and culture. It was believed that this would help them cope with their complex and ever-changing work environment and would therefore result in more favourable employee attitudes, higher retention and increased sales.

To analyse the effectiveness of the programme, we analysed employee perceptions, behaviours and business performance using data from employee surveys and the firm's HR and payroll system. We determined that the staff who went through the programme were much more committed to the organisation, and turnover was reduced by half in the first three months.

We also found that employee commitment levels within business units had a significant impact on sales performance. The net effect of reduced turnover and absenteeism and increased sales on bottom-line business performance amounted to over U.S. $5 million in the first year.




Rod Fralicx is a principal at Mercer Human Resource Consulting www.mercerHR.com. He can be reached at rod.fralicx@mercer.com.


Discuss this topic with other IABC members at: www.iabc.com/memberspeak.