IABC - International Association of Business CommunicatorsBe Heard HomeJoin IABCSite MapContact Us
 


publications

CW Bulletin

CW Bulletin is the e-newsletter supplement to CW magazine. Sent each month to all members, every issue of CW Bulletin presents articles, case studies and additional resources on timely topics in communication.

top.gif CW Bulletin



The Rising Power of Research in the Boardroom

By Sandra Macleod


Reputation risk has become an increasingly important item on the boardroom agenda. Conscientious and/or beleaguered company directors are turning to research for a sense of the health of their world and, in turn, the measure of the responsibilities they must assume. Like a ‘wellperson clinic,’ objective and independent research is increasingly being used to test perceptions and expectations and monitor the weak signals or murmurs that may either support them or destroy them in the years, if not months, ahead.

For the reluctant directors out there, new-style regulation is ensuring that being pessimistic is no way to run a company. Beyond tarnished personal reputations, the penalties for poor risk management and oversight can range from unlimited fines and censure to imprisonment.

We have entered the Age of Perceived Risk where nothing is now risk-free—least of all, being a company director. Look at the rallying cry of most if not all special interest groups and NGOs. Consider U.S. President George Bush’s pronouncements on corporate responsibility. In an election speech on 6 Aug. 2004, Bush stressed transparency in companies with a clear echo of Enron and the subsequent Sarbanes-Oxley legislation: "If you're a CEO in corporate America, you're responsible for telling the truth to your shareholders and your employees." Consider, too, the ever-increasing number of European directives: the EU CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ACTION PLAN issued for consultation mid-2003, the EU Sustainable Development Strategy adopted by the European Council at the Gothenburg Summit in 2001, and Council of Europe Green Paper "Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility" (2001).

Behind this new age is the loss of trust and credibility in institutions—within the corporate and public sectors—in the face of real consumer angst and social power, and the might of the litigant. These developments present risks and challenges that organisations cannot ignore.

In recent surveys, when asked if they cared about their reputation, not surprisingly, nearly all CEOs said yes. Yet when asked if they measured it, or even monitored risks to their reputation, less than a fifth to a third were doing so. The same is true for regulatory risk. In the latest study by the London School of Economics for legal experts DLA , 96 percent of 50 among the FTSE250 Company Directors interviewed believe that regulatory risks are growing, but nearly a third (30 percent) of boards are unaware of the activities within their organisation which may lead to regulatory intervention. Less than one in five (18 percent) are ‘very confident’ in their risk management processes.

As an organisation’s key audiences become more wary, directors must be prepared to deal honestly and effectively with the complex web of risk controversies and to develop their skills in negotiating with players whose perspectives and priorities may be radically different from their own.

Welcome, then, to the world of risk assessment, the world of measurement and the world of assessing and balancing the expectations of a variety of increasingly important stakeholders.

Company directors need to know

• What is changing in the external world
• How this affects where we want to go

They need to keep themselves up to date on a weekly, and sometimes daily basis. By the time they see the results of an interview-based study taking several weeks or months, the world will have moved on. There may be new issues and active stakeholder groups to consider, ones that were not even on the horizon when the study was started. The challenge is to identify the new issues and their champions as they emerge, before they have gathered momentum and become hard to influence.


Methodology

Internal audits and external stakeholder research are essential, because they can provide the depth of analysis and the strategic context without which it would be dangerous to act. But these processes lack speed. The analysis of on- and off-line media content and key stakeholder and competitor web sites provides a rapid, and by no means superficial, insight into corporate reputations as they evolve, and issues as they emerge.

Which issues are likely to present risks in the near future, and what will the impact be on your reputation?


For speed and comprehensiveness, the web is unbeatable. The issue-research challenge is to cast the net wide enough to pick up information from a vast and ever-expanding search domain, identify what really matters and analyse it in depth, without drowning in data. You cannot analyse the whole web, any more than you can interview every potential opinion-former. But if you limit your search to the ‘usual suspects,’ i.e., the sites you are familiar with and search-terms that form part of your everyday corporate vocabulary, you will miss the early signs and the weak signals.

The most promising approach to this challenge is to list your usual suspects, use external consultants and opinion formers to add just a few to the initial list, and start the search with as large a set of search terms as you can handle. Then remove duplicates and eliminate records ruthlessly, using judgement more than technology. But also expand the search domain, in a controlled manner, by screening and adding linked sites. You identify emerging influentials and their issues, but avoid adding those communicators nobody is listening to.

There is still a long way to go in developing these methods, but already we are seeing results that are helping to focus minds in the boardroom.


Priorities for Management Attention and Action

By integrating stakeholder and content data into available organisational knowledge about stakeholder relations and the changing perceptual environment, we add insight into emerging issues, which may not yet have moved into the visual range of directors. We identify and interpret those that may present future threats or opportunities for the company, and integrate the external and internal information to help focus the board on the priorities for present action.

In the move towards greater sustainability (in the broadest sense of the word), organisations need to scan the horizon of stakeholder expectations—and most importantly—hear their early warning signs of emerging issues and uncertainties. Today’s organisations ignore this basic approach at their peril. It smacks not only of gross irresponsibility, but, increasingly, of gross misconduct as well.

 


Echo Research Group, international specialists in reputation analysis and communication research, provides intelligence about perception and image, to help clients understand the structure of their reputation and maximise their strategic decisions. With 165 analysts, Echo has offices outside London (in Surrey), Brussels, Paris, Stockholm and New York. Echo's clients include a quarter of the FTSE and Fortune 100 and Government Departments. Echo works across a number of industry sectors, with particular expertise in Environment, Government, Consumer, Financial Services, Health, IT, Telecommunications, Media, Professional Services, Public Sector and NGOs. More information and resources can be found at www.echoResearch.com.