Corporate reputation rankings are derived from
an amalgam of company characteristics such as leadership and
financial performance. Fortune’s America’s
Most Admired Companies ranking features eight key attributes,
The Reputation Institute’s RQ tracks six factors and The
Delahaye Index tracks five reputation silos with 30 overall
subcategories. As such, a particular company such as Wal-Mart
may perform relatively poorly on a particular measure, such
as “Employer of Choice,” while excelling on another,
such as “Quality and Value of Products and Services.” In other words, companies have many opportunities to succeed
and fail, but if they can generate more visibility and awareness
for the measures on which they perform well than they do on
those measures upon which they perform less successfully, they
can emerge victorious.
The Walt Disney Corporation
In late 2003, The Walt Disney Corporation was embroiled in
a boardroom squabble. However, the incredible success of "Pirates
of the Caribbean" and "Finding Nemo" engendered
enormous favorability and widespread goodwill. The company
might have performed poorly on a factor such as “Quality
of Leadership” but the movie properties caused a factor
such as “Quality and Value of Products and Services”
to soar. The net result: Disney was a winner in 2003. The
absence of such blockbuster success in the first quarter of
2004 hurt the company’s ranking a bit, but not materially
since the boardroom buzz diminished.
For every Walt Disney Company or Wal-Mart, there is a company
that consistently performs at the highest levels: FedEx, Johnson
& Johnson, Home Depot and General Electric, for example.
These companies manage to perform well in all attributes and
in most corporate reputation studies, year after year.
Performance vs. Visibility
Much more interesting are those companies who perform well
in reputation studies but who tend to pull their rankings
from performance rather than visibility. Using the Delahaye
Index and Fortune’s America’s Most Admired
Companies rankings as the foundations for this analysis, Massachusetts
Mutual manages to excel among the senior executives and analysts
who drive Fortune’s rankings, finishing second
among life and health insurance companies. However, in the
Delahaye Index which is based on the quantity and quality
of news coverage, Massachusetts Mutual ranks 98th out of 100,
simply because the company lacks the visibility required to
elevate its position (the company appeared in opinion-leading
media only 32 times in Q2, 2004 compared to the top five companies
who generated an average of 5,000 stories during the same
time period). Ironically, Massachusetts Mutual accomplished
the much more difficult task of generating the highest quality
stories of any company in the Delahaye Index. For some reason,
the company prefers a more introverted stance rather than
publicizing its clearly superior performance.
As far as we know, there is no ranking for America’s
Least Admired Companies, but just a few years ago, the list
would have been filled with some highly recognized names:
Enron and MCI WorldCom come to mind. These companies have
suffered greatly for their misdeeds, but other companies from
that time have improved their performance. Ford Motor Company,
for example, has emerged among the top ten in the Q2, 2004
Delahaye Index, putting its debacles with Firestone behind.
Similarly, Tyco and K-Mart are generating improved performance.
The remaining question is “what can you do about it?”
The best insurance of a good reputation is performance. In
their book “Fame & Fortune,” authors Charles
Fombrun and Cees B.N. Van Riel state that reputation is driven
by five characteristics: visibility, authenticity, consistency,
distinctiveness and transparency. The best companies exhibit
these characteristics in everything they do. But first, when
the company performs and succeeds in its business, visibility
follows. When all the necessary characteristics come together,
the result is an excellent reputation.
Q2 2004 Delahaye Index Rankings Net Effect in U.S. Millions |
1. Microsoft Corporation 1,755
2. The Walt Disney Company 1,625
3. Verizon Communications Inc. 990
4. General Motors Corporation 929
5. Intel Corporation 925
6. The Boeing Company 835
7. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 807
8. Ford Motor Company 780
9. General Electric Company 698
10. Wachovia Corporation 685
|
Source: The Delahaye Index. Net Effect = an index weighted
by the amount of positive and negative coverage of a company.
Includes print (newspapers and magazines) and television
news coverage. |
Mark Weiner is CEO of Delahaye Medialink, the leading
global research-based public relations consultancy. Delahaye
provides a variety of research and evaluation services that
includes media analysis and survey research, as well as research
and advisory services to public relations, marketing and communication
professionals. Mark is a frequent lecturer on measurement
topics for the Conference Board, IABC and PRSA. Most recently,
Mark was elected Chair of the Measurement Commission for the
Institute for Public Relations (IPR). He can be reached at
mweiner@delahaye.com.
|